|Offender||David Patrick Majella Keating|
|Charge||Charge Number||Offence Date||Date Convicted||Regulation||Section||Penalty Provision||Penalty Imposed||Date Sentenced|
|1||MI15173/09||9 October 2007||2nd December 2010||55(1) 55(1)(b) 55(1a)(b)||3A(3)(a)(i)||$45,000.00||2nd December 2010|
|Description of Breach(es)||
The Accused, being a director of D & G Hoists & Cranes Pty Ltd (a body corporate), was guilty of an offence under the Occupational Safety and Health Act 1984 and the offence occurred with the consent and/ or was attributable to the neglect of the Accused; contrary to sections 55(1), 19(1) and 19A(2) of the Occupational Safety and Health Act 1984.
D & G Hoists and Cranes Pty Ltd was a sales and rental company that hired out an assortment of hoists and cranes. The company also provided erection, dismantling and maintenance services for hoists and cranes. The erection of cranes could involve moving components called an L68 pack. An L68 Pack comprises 16 components weighing 375 kg each, stacked into interwoven rows of eight.
The Directors of D & G Hoists and Cranes Pty Ltd were David Patrick Majella Keating (the Accused) and Luigi Vincenzo Decesare.
The Accused and the other director of D & G Hoists and Cranes Pty Ltd were experienced in the slinging of loads, and both were qualified doggers and riggers. Both the Accused and the other director were ‘hands on' in terms of being based at the workplace and frequently in the yard.
At the time of the incident, the hierarchy within the workplace was:
Most of the workers employed at the workplace were qualified dogmen and/or riggers.
Both the Accused and the other director knew that:
Method 2 had nevertheless been in use at the workplace on a regular basis for some time prior to the accident on October 2007.
Five employees who were recent employees prior to the accident, believed based in part on instructions from more senior doggers/riggers, that Method 2 was the method to be used to move L68 Packs in the workplace.
The Accused and the other director did not know that Method 2 was in use and believed or thought that the Yard Supervisor was enforcing the use of Method 1.
The Accused accepted that it was one of his responsibilities to oversee the work of employees and to see that it was done safely. He also accepted that employees sometimes ‘do things in a way that they shouldn't'.
On 9th October 2007, three riggers (including the deceased) received instructions from the Yard Supervisor to lift three L68 Packs and place them into an adjacent yard for storage using the yard tower crane.
The chains were set on the crane hook and slung by the three riggers, with the chains going down the outside of the pack and at the corners hooking around the bottom sections of the pack (Method 2). The three riggers walked around to the area where the pack was to be placed so as to guide the crane operator to lower the load. The load was approximately two metres above the ground when the L68 Pack separated causing fourteen of the sixteen components to fall out.
A rigger was struck on the head by one of the falling components and suffered a fatal head injury.
It was foreseeable that an employee might use a method other than Method 1 in slinging L68 Packs despite the doggers/riggers qualifications.
D & G Hoists and Cranes Pty Ltd had failed to have the appropriate slinging method (Method 1) in place and enforced at the time of the accident. That omission resulted in the dangerous Method 2 being used.
As to the Accused and the other director it was found that:
The Accused was found guilty after trial. The Magistrate fined the Accused $45,000 and ordered costs of $7736.40.
|Court||Magistrates Court of Western Australia - Midland|
Search the records of all successful prosecutions taken by WorkSafe under the Occupational Safety and Health Act 1984 and Occupational Safety and Health Regulations 1996 since 1st January 2005. Searching and indexing of this database is limited to convictions for offences against the Occupational Safety and Health Act 1984 and Occupational Safety and Health Regulations 1996 committed on or after 1 January 2005, when the statutory offence and penalty regimes were significantly amended.
Offences committed prior to 1 January 2005, while of limited comparative relevance, can be accessed via the following link.